The series in retrospect

Some people might complain that Attenborough (and his team) got the order of programmes all wrong: the series should start like “Trials” with the start of new life (Flowering, programme 3) being followed by the one about this life leaving home to, literally, strike root far from its parent (Travelling, programme 1) and ending with the new plant awaiting the chance to reach adulthood (Growing, programme 2). All of these programmes belonged to the first disk of the box set. The current order, they would claim, making the story rather incoherent.

They might say that the second disk consists of rather incoherent material and having a coherent story on the first one would lead to inconsistency. But the second disk actually forms logical order: Starting with the social struggle (which might form a logical follow up to the plant growing up), it continues with various plants living together leading to co-operation and even parasitism and ending (in episode 3) with plants overcoming even the harshest of environments (too cold, too wet, too dry or too changeable) apart from the onslaught of humans which is mentioned only in the final minutes.

The most likely explanation, for this unusual order, is probably the fact that the key to making the series is the technical breakthrough of time-lapse filming due to improved computer technology. To make it even more conspicuous they put this programme forward, making it central to the series, dropping a bomb shell at the beginning. Having flowers as a central point might have made this technology seem rather insignificant because filming them had already been possible for decades. This meant any otherwise logical order would have to be sacrificed so Attenborough’s introduction to the next episode was scrapped. Instead of a continuous sequence of episodes, where one ends with an introduction to the next, there is no indication of any follow-up among the programmes.

Did they sacrifice a typical Attenborough series with a neat flow of events for a breathtaking start of a series? Should they have used this method or the typical Attenborough one? The answer must depend on personal taste, yet despite any possible misgivings due to the above few would argue against the series being full of mind-boggling technical wizardry that makes the series unforgettable.

3-“Flowering”

Original air date: 25 January 1995

Outline of the programme

The outline shows a relatively complicated programme where the main focus is on the pollinators. Being about the start of a new plant it could easily be argued that this should have been the starting episode.

The Private Life of Plants (1995)

Introduction

This series marks a turning point in the Life Collection: for the first time computer technology is being used as a standard practice.

Unavoidably a lot of the sound in the series is based on sound effects, the plants live in a silent world but Attenborough’s people decided without sound effects the series would be rather dull. In any other series such decisions would be questionable but here they are probably vital for the scenes not to be completely silent apart from him talking.
The audience may have wondered about the word “Private” in the title. It is made quite clear in the first scene what Attenborough means, and even more so in his reflections: Plants living on a very different time-scale from ours live a life that we don’t sense. Speeding up things is necessary to comprehend what is happening.
Despite the series being predominantly about plants it does also necessarily involve other organisms in important (even leading) roles. Insects and mammals play a big role and fungi are in the main leading role apart from the plants themselves. To make the point quite plain at start: Fungi are neither plants nor animals, they have a molecular structure quite unique to themselves and belong to their own kingdom. However, playing a vital role in plant ecology they show up numerous times in the series.

The series consists of six programmes of which the first three are about plants in general but the rest are about them in a wider context.

Our Planet – The Series

First aired :  5 April 2019

Broadcast worldwide by Netflix.

The series is consists of eight programmes. The first one was an overview followed by a separate programme dealing with each of several environments.

1 – One Planet – the overview of the series

An outline of the overview programme

The programme implies that the nutrients from the ‘far away’ deserts ‘only’ provide nutrients for the seas. The accompanying book, on the other hand, states that the sandstorms in question do even reach the South American continent and the Amazon. Images from space confirm this (due to copyright laws they cannot be included here). What’s more, it’s been recently discovered that those storms are not the only means of nutrients from remote places: Phosphorus and possibly other vital elements have turned out to be transported westwards from various parts of Africa.*

2 – Frozen worlds

3 – Jungles

4 – Coasts

5 – Deserts to Grasslands

6 – The High Seas

7 – Fresh Water

Final programme:

8 – Forests

References:

Our Planet. Alastair Fothergill & Keith Scholey. (Penguin Random House, UK. 2019) (pp. 136-7) .

*Anne E. Barkley et al (2019). African biomass burning is a substantial source of phosphorus deposition to the Amazon, Tropical Atlantic Ocean, and Southern Ocean . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. PNAS first published July 29, 2019. Retrieved. 30. July 2019.

Introduction to Our Planet

Original air date: 5 April 2019

The series Our Planet is a tribute to our great natural world as have so many other series. This one stands alone in showing how badly it has been treated by us.

The series is from the producers of series like Frozen Planet which was a fight to document the poles without there being too much of a downbeat message.

Attenborough decided to go to Netflix because of their world wide audiences, BBC is mainly limited to the UK in addition to those other broadcasters that buy broadcasting rights and possible DVD releases. Netflix has no such limitations. The producers also have a larger budget and have been able to film sequences that had been unthinkable until now. The obvious drawback is that Attenborough’s material consequently is no longer freely available to his countrymen in the UK. It is debatable how logical it is to get the best way to get such an important message across if the only people to get it are those who pay for it ?? There is probably no need to preach to the already converted. Attenborough fans that are, non Netflix subscribers will undoubtedly feel themselves hard done by. The best way to get such an important message across should surely be to make is as freely available as possible although that obviously raises the question of financing.

Reviews:

https://variety.com/2019/tv/reviews/our-planet-Netflix-David-attenborough-review-1203181075/

Guardian